You already built the AI.It just isn't working.
Two weeks. We assess the code, the solution, and the strategy — then fix what's broken. You get a report and working changes, not a slide deck.
Four situations.Any one of them fits.
Someone started it, scope moved, and it never went live.
It answers confidently and it's wrong, so nobody trusts it.
It works, technically. Your team routes around it anyway.
You have code you can't read and no one to ask.
None of these you? Then don't start with an audit.
An audit assesses something that already exists. If you're starting from zero, the build is the right first step — and phase one of that is a free call.
We've audited our ownsystem the hard way.
Operating Querive in production means we've already paid for the lessons an audit looks for — retrieval that misses, answers that drift, costs that creep, integrations that silently stop. We check your build against failures we've had to fix on our own system, not against a checklist.
Most people auditing AI have never shipped one.
Visit QueriveThree layers.All of them, every time.
Most audits stop at the first row. The third is usually where the real problem is.
Structure, error handling, dependencies, test coverage, what happens when a call fails.
Prompt design, retrieval setup, grounding, escalation paths, cost per interaction.
Whether the thing being automated was worth automating, and what should have been built instead.
A report, and the fixes.
What's wrong, why, and what it's costing you. In plain language, not a technical dump.
We make the changes we can make inside the two weeks. Working code, not recommendations.
What's left, in priority order, with what each item takes. Yours to do, or to hand to anyone.
Everything is yours. Whether you work with us afterwards or not.
Two weeks. No surprises.
A 45-minute call to understand what was built, what it was meant to do, and where it hurts. You grant access. We start the same day.
We go through the code, the setup, and the decisions behind it. Friday you get a call with what we've found — before any fixes, so nothing is a surprise.
We make the changes, document them, and deliver the report and roadmap. One handover call to walk your team through it.
Your total time: two calls and the kickoff. We work from the access you give us.
Sometimes the fixes are enough.
Plenty of builds only need what the audit delivers. If yours does, that's where it ends and we'll say so.
If it needs more — a rebuild, a second agent, automation underneath it — you'll have a roadmap and a price. No obligation attached to either.
Businesses we’ve built for
From our software and automation engagements — the same team now builds the AI systems.
Outstanding work across multiple projects — thorough, straight with us, and they ship.
Five questions,answered straight.
Then you get a report saying so, and we'll tell you where the actual problem is — usually the workflow around the system rather than the system itself. The fee stands either way; you're paying for the answer, not the outcome.
Yes, read access at minimum, and credentials for whatever the system connects to. We can work from a copy if you'd rather not grant live access.
Then they go on the roadmap with a scope and a price. We don't quietly extend and invoice.
Yes.
No. The audit is a standalone engagement — you pay $2,000 and everything it produces is yours. If you continue into fixes or a build, that work is scoped and priced separately, from the roadmap you already own. No bundling, no pressure to continue.
Two weeks. $2,000. Then you know.
If your AI isn't doing what it was built to do, you'll have the answer and the fixes inside a fortnight.
Your business should run without you running it manually.